<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion Object Creation &#8211; More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more</link>
	<description>The online journey of a technophile, by Steve Brownlee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc esher</title>
		<link>http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more/comment-page-1#comment-33147</link>
		<dc:creator>marc esher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fusioncube.net/?p=319#comment-33147</guid>
		<description>now that&#039;s more like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that&#8217;s more like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brownlee</title>
		<link>http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more/comment-page-1#comment-33146</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brownlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fusioncube.net/?p=319#comment-33146</guid>
		<description>More on that marc... I yanked all the code out of my components so I could run unit tests on the conversion and I&#039;m seeing the times you mentioned.  

At 50 rows, the conversion to structs take 63ms and the conversion to DTOs take 437ms.

At 1000 rows, the times are 250ms and 7109ms respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on that marc&#8230; I yanked all the code out of my components so I could run unit tests on the conversion and I&#8217;m seeing the times you mentioned.  </p>
<p>At 50 rows, the conversion to structs take 63ms and the conversion to DTOs take 437ms.</p>
<p>At 1000 rows, the times are 250ms and 7109ms respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brownlee</title>
		<link>http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more/comment-page-1#comment-33145</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brownlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fusioncube.net/?p=319#comment-33145</guid>
		<description>Possibly, marc, but the code is absurdly simple.  The times include the query time as well.  I didn&#039;t just time the conversion process, but the entire request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly, marc, but the code is absurdly simple.  The times include the query time as well.  I didn&#8217;t just time the conversion process, but the entire request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc esher</title>
		<link>http://www.fusioncube.net/index.php/coldfusion-object-creation-more/comment-page-1#comment-33143</link>
		<dc:creator>marc esher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fusioncube.net/?p=319#comment-33143</guid>
		<description>hey steve,

your numbers for converting to an array of structs seem awfully high to me. so I ran a test locally on a 1000-row query with 95 columns, and it creates that 1000-element array of 95-key structs in under 200ms on average. 

maybe your querytoArrayOfStruct code needs tuned?

marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey steve,</p>
<p>your numbers for converting to an array of structs seem awfully high to me. so I ran a test locally on a 1000-row query with 95 columns, and it creates that 1000-element array of 95-key structs in under 200ms on average. </p>
<p>maybe your querytoArrayOfStruct code needs tuned?</p>
<p>marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

